Home  | Membership | Documents & Letters | Links  | Forum  | Chatroom | Donations | Search.

 ESPAÑOL 

.
INFOCUBA
-History
-
Government
-
Economy
-
Social
-
Education
-
Health Care
-
Culture
-
Ecology
-
Cuba in Pictures

 
HUMAN RIGHTS
-Human Rights Violations
-
Separated Families
-
Cubans Assassinated by Fidel Castro's regime (The Black List)
-
Massacres Executed by Cuban Government
-
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
-
Crimes Videos
 
OPPOSICION
-The Opposition in Cuba
-Cuban Political Prisoners
-
Independent Journalists
-
Important Documents
-
Bibliotecas Independientes

 
TERRORISM
-Cuba & Terrorism
-
Castro & Middle East
-
Biological Warfare
-
US Government Reports
-
Photo Gallery

 
ARCHIVE
-Year 2008
-Year 2007

-
Year 2006
-
Year 2005
-
Year 2004
-
Year 2003
-
Year 2002

 

 

Registered & Hosted by
www.versioninternet.com

 
   

NEWS


CUBA

Recent reforms in Cuba rattle Fidel
Fidel Castro showed his displeasure over brother Raúl's recent economic and societal concessions.

Posted on Thu, Apr. 17, 2008

BY RENATO PEREZ
rperez@MiamiHerald.com 
Not even two months into his brother Raúl Castro's reign in Cuba, Fidel Castro has openly expressed displeasure with supporters of economic and societal reforms.

His latest missive appears to be a direct attack on a column published in one of Cuba's state-run media, which suggested that the latest series of reforms launched by Raúl Castro are a step toward progress.

Although Castro has written slight barbs at his brother's policies before, it was the first apparent reference to a string of reforms recently enacted that reversed years of Castro regulations.

In a column published Wednesday in Granma, the Communist Party daily, the former Cuban leader, who formally gave up power on Feb. 24, chided those who seek changes to avoid a repetition of the ''special period'' of retrenchment in Cuba that followed the demise of the socialist bloc.

In the article, titled ''Do not make concessions to enemy ideology,'' Castro wrote that ``People must be very careful with everything they say, so as not to play the game of enemy ideology. They cannot blame the Special Period for the system that imperialism has imposed upon the world. . . . The Special Period was the inevitable consequence of the disappearance of the USSR, which lost the ideological battle and led us to a stage of heroic resistance from which we still have not wholly emerged.''

Cuba's ''special period'' was the term given to the period of widespread shortages that came after the fall of the Soviet Union. Reforms like allowing the U.S. dollar and some private business also followed to help address the economic crisis.

Since Raúl Castro took over, he has launched a series of minor but symbolically important measures such as allowing Cubans to stay in hotels, buy cellphones and computers. Last week, the government announced it would allow longtime tenants of government housing to obtain property titles and pass them on to heirs.

When he was sworn in, Raúl vowed to run any major decision by his brother. It's not clear if Fidel had signed off on the recent changes, but, in what may have been a veiled advice to reformers, he wrote: ``Meditate hard on what you say, what you affirm, so you don't make shameful concessions.''

Castro said he wrote the article ''after listening to a public comment disseminated by one of the Revolution's mass media, which I shall not mention specifically.'' He appears to be taking a direct jab at an article published Friday in the Havana daily Juventud Rebelde, Rebel Youth, written by senior columnist Luis Sexto.

Titled ''Going in reverse is not going forward,'' it refers to the concessions -- the adjustments -- Cuba had to make after it lost the economic backing of the Soviet Union. Concessions are not necessarily bad, Sexto implied. The word should be redefined.

''For example, if the experience accumulated in our deteriorating circumstances indicates that big agricultural companies are not recommended and that [. . .] family or individual labor be cooperatized or encouraged, why should we insist on that which does not prosper or that which needs an excess of resources for completion?'' Sexto wrote.

'Is a `concession' a step backward?'' he wrote. ``. . . Of course, the man who is accustomed to issue dictates from his office or from his Jeep -- what to sow, how to harvest -- may be distressed to see producers gaining autonomy, gaining the ability to make their own decisions.''

A ''step backward,'' he said, often ''promotes movement'' and can be considered progress.

''I do think that there could be a little difference between Raúl and Fidel in terms of how much needs to be done and how quickly it needs to be done,'' said Andy Gomez, a senior fellow at the University of Miami's Institute for Cuban and Cuban American Studies. 'I would not say, `if Fidel doesn't like it, too bad,' but it may be too late.''

Miami Herald correspondent Frances Robles contributed to this report.




News Archive | Home


 

 


Home  | Membership | Documents & Letters | Links | Forum | Chatroom | Donations | Search


NET FOR CUBA INTERNATIONAL
http://www.netforcuba.org 
All Rights Reserved  ©